The Effect of Managerial Ability on Performance with the Mediating Role of Capital Structure

Authors

https://doi.org/10.22105/aaa.v1i3.46

Abstract

This study examined the effect of management ability on the performance of companies in Tehran capital market with the mediating role of capital structure. We were analyzed and investigated using data collection through past information (post-event) to be included in descriptive-correlational studies. In addition, the information Rahavard Navin software and Tadbir Pardaz software and the audited financial statements and notes of the companies are used to collect the relevant data. Our statistical population in this research consists of all companies in the capital market of Tehran, some of which have been selected and analyzed in this study. In this study, data analysis was carried out for companies in the Tehran capital market from 2016 to 2022 using Eviews software and dynamic panel model (PMG). The method used in this research is descriptive-analytical; to match the economic theories with the realities of the society, the causal relationships between variables were investigated using statistics and figures, and after matching with the theories, using inferential statistics and dynamic panel econometric method and ARDL panel model were tested in Eviews software to reject or prove the presented hypotheses, which were accepted according to the results of all three research hypotheses in both models.

Keywords:

Management ability, Capital structure, Firm performance, Human resources, Net income

References

  1. [1] Ahi, F., Toulabi, Z., & Mohammadi, E. (2021). The effect of strategic thinking and strategic planning on company performance with the moderating role of strategic foresight (case study: gas company of kermanshah province). New research approaches in management and accounting, 5(17), 10–22.
  2. [2] Juliana, C., Gani, L., & Jermias, J. (2021). Performance implications of misalignment among business strategy, leadership style, organizational culture and management accounting systems. International journal of ethics and systems, 37(4), 509–525. https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/IJOES-02-2021-0033/full/html
  3. [3] Sirén, C., & Kohtamäki, M. (2016). Stretching strategic learning to the limit: the interaction between strategic planning and learning. Journal of business research, 69(2), 653–663. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0148296315003847
  4. [4] Momtazian, A., & Kazemnejad, M. (2016). Managerial abilities and performance measures. Empirical research in accounting, 5(4), 65-88. (In Persian).
  5. [5] Dian, Y., & Xuanyu, O. (2020). The rise and impact of financial capitalism: a sociological analysis of new forms of capitalism. Social sciences in china, 41(4), 24–43. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/02529203.2020.1844422
  6. [6] Bentley-Goode, K. A., Omer, T. C., & Twedt, B. J. (2019). Does business strategy impact a firm’s information environment? Journal of accounting, auditing & finance, 34(4), 563–587. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/0148558X17726893
  7. [7] Wang, W., Lu, W., Kweh, Q. L., & Lee, J. (2021). Management characteristics and corporate performance of chinese chemical companies: the moderating effect of managerial ability. International transactions in operational research, 28(2), 976–995. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/itor.12575
  8. [8] Chen, Z., Harford, J., & Kamara, A. (2019). Operating leverage, profitability, and capital structure. Journal of financial and quantitative analysis, 54(1), 369–392. DOI:10.1017/S0022109018000595
  9. [9] Huang, X., Kabir, R., & Zhang, L. (2018). Government ownership and the capital structure of firms: analysis of an institutional context from china. China journal of accounting research, 11(3), 171–185. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1755309118301345
  10. [10] Klasa, S., Ortiz-Molina, H., Serfling, M., & Srinivasan, S. (2018). Protection of trade secrets and capital structure decisions. Journal of financial economics, 128(2), 266–286. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304405X18300473
  11. [11] Hui, K. W., Liang, C., & Yeung, P. E. (2019). The effect of major customer concentration on firm profitability: competitive or collaborative? Review of accounting studies, 24, 189–229. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11142-018-9469-8
  12. [12] Liljeblom, E., Maury, B., & Hörhammer, A. (2020). Complex state ownership, competition, and firm performance–Russian evidence. International journal of emerging markets, 15(2), 189–221. https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/IJOEM-08-2017-0287/full/html
  13. [13] Demerjian, P., Lev, B., & McVay, S. (2012). Quantifying managerial ability: a new measure and validity tests. Management science, 58(7), 1229–1248. https://pubsonline.informs.org/doi/abs/10.1287/mnsc.1110.1487
  14. [14] Fama, E. F., & French, K. R. (1997). Industry costs of equity. Journal of financial economics, 43(2), 153–193. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304405X96008963

Downloads

Published

2024-05-18

Issue

Vol. 1 No. 3 (2024): Accounting and Auditing with Applications

Section

Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2024 Accounting and Auditing with Applications

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

How to Cite

Fazl, S. . (2024). The Effect of Managerial Ability on Performance with the Mediating Role of Capital Structure. Accounting and Auditing With Applications , 1(3), 153-163. https://doi.org/10.22105/aaa.v1i3.46

Similar Articles

11-20 of 21

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.